Sunday, April 30, 2006

Scientology

A qoute from http://www.scientology.org/

In Scientology no one is asked to accept anything as belief or on faith. That which is true for you is what you have observed to be true. An individual discovers for himself that Scientology works by personally applying its principles and observing or experiencing results.

Through Scientology, people all over the world are achieving the long-sought goal of true spiritual release and freedom.

Learn more about the beliefs of Scientology
Hahaha... I think they should reword this, no?

Saturday, April 29, 2006

No one likes to program anymore!

Slashdot had this on it today:
From his journal, hogghogg asks: "I keep finding myself in conversations with tertiary educators in the hard sciences (Physics, Astronomy, Chemistry, etc.) who note that even the geeks—those who voluntarily choose to major in hard sciences—enter university never having programmed a computer. When I was in grade six, the Commodore PET came out, and I jumped at the opportunity to learn how to program it. Now, evidently, most high school computer classes are about Word (tm) and Excel (tm). Is this a bad thing? Should we care?" Do you think the desire to program computers has declined in the younger generations? If so, what reasons might you cite as the cause?

I think that the reason programming might not appeal to the masses as it used to may be because nothing anyone can make compare to the software available commercially.

Back in the day, people would make a spreadsheet program for themselves, and use it. People would make a calculator, and use it. Hell, maybe even a game! These days, it's not possible for most computer end users to create anything useful for themselves, when compared to the commercially available software.

Whether or not this is good or bad is way to subjective for me to have any desire to get into, but I'd say one thing: It reflects that as a society, we've taken programming to a level of sophistication that can only be accomplished by a collaborative and dedicated effort, something most 6-year-olds probably don't get excited about.

Tuesday, April 25, 2006

MSFT desperate tactics

BetaNews reported a few days ago...

Microsoft is heading to college campuses to promote its Windows Live service in a new way -- by hosting college e-mail accounts. Called Windows Live@edu, 72 colleges worldwide have signed onto the service and discussions are ongoing with almost 200 more. The e-mail service provides a familiar interface to many students as it is patterned after Hotmail. However, students do not receive a hotmail.com or msn.com e-mail address, as the accounts it carry the domain of their respective school. The move is intended to promote the Windows Live suite of services, and also establish continuing loyalty. Although the Live services are traditionally advertiser supported, Live@edu accounts would not show ads to users while they are in school. Microsoft does, however, reserve the right to turn on the ads after they graduate. The Redmond company believes that catching the students early on will turn them into life-long users of Windows Live. They would likely create a Windows Live Messenger account, start a blog and organize their favorites under this e-mail account -- especially if they plan to continue using it, Microsoft says. Google recently announced a similar program for its Gmail service, serving students of San Jose City College in California. Microsoft touts its service as better, as it provides much more control to the IT administrator than Google's option. Also, the infrastructure to provide the Live@edu is already present, which means there is little cost associated in offering it. But although there has been a rapid uptake of the service, the company says it still meets resistance and skepticism. In return, Microsoft has been assuring education institutions that its only motivation is to get students using Windows Live, promising there are no ulterior plans.

Selling themselves to schools is fine, but what I have a problem with is that the only browser the support is IE6, and they don't support POP, IMAP, or email forwarding. I mean this is just nothing but a MSTrap! I would think it's self-demeaning on MSFT's behalf, no?

I would have thought that by now people have started thinking that it's just not cool to use purely MSFT things and surrender any freedom of choice, I mean at least IT managers. And IMAP/POP allows you to use mail clients, and are such a huge step up from web-based email, as far as organising your mailbox/address book goes. That they refuse to let people do this really dirty business.

Anyway, thinking that targetting college is a way of catching students early might be naive: These days even the least technically savy HS student has an email address and probably uses some mail client.

I think, and hope, that this will be met with some resistance and displeasure by students. The computer/online life is, these days, such a huge part of our lives that it's crucial to educate oneself in this area, about the choices that exist and the advantages/disadvantages between them.

In the coming years our electronic lives will play a growing part in our human lives, and it's dangerous for everyone if this area is controlled by a single entity. There're even movies made about this sort of thing. We'll be living in a dictatorship, essentially.

Foremost I think it's important for governments to move to using information infrastructure that is not vended by a commercial party. Otherwise our governments themselves may come at the mercy of a commercial force.

One painless solution is for MSFT to be split up into a number of different corporations: one for IE; one for the OS; one for Office; etcetera. This would not even require the masses to learn something other than Windows, at the same time creating a less dangerous world.

Thursday, April 13, 2006

Cell-Division Reversed!

From slashdot today: A scientist got the cell-division process to be reversed. This could have some wonderful implications on cancer treatment.

Thing is, this probably will only benefit my grandkids (I'm 24). I wish that scientific progress could hit the mainstream faster than it does.

Another thought: Say with this and other research in such areas, we reach a point where cancer is easily curable. Will that make people start smoking and what not much more?